Since 2002, FoLLI (the Association for Logic, Language, and Information, http://www.folli.org) awards the E.W. Beth Dissertation Prize to outstanding dissertations in the fields of Logic, Language, and Information. We invite submissions for the best dissertation which resulted in a Ph.D. degree in the year 2011. The dissertations will be judged on technical depth and strength, originality, and impact made in at least two of three fields of Logic, Language, and Computation. Interdisciplinarity is an important feature of the theses competing for the E.W. Beth Dissertation Prize.

 
Who qualifies
 
Nominations of candidates are admitted who were awarded a Ph.D. degree in the areas of Logic, Language, or Information between January 1st, 2011 and December 31st, 2011. There is no restriction on the nationality of the candidate or the university where the Ph.D. was granted. After a careful consideration, FoLLI has decided to accept only dissertations written in English. Dissertations produced in 2011 but not written in English or not translated will be allowed for submission, after translation, also with the call next year (for dissertations defended in 2012). The present call for nominations for the E.W. Beth Disertation Award 2012 will also accept nominations of full English translations of theses originally written in another language than English and defended in 2010 or 2011.
 
Prize
 
The prize consists of:
– a certificate
– a donation of 2500 euros provided by the E.W. Beth Foundation
– an invitation to submit the thesis (or a revised version of it) to the FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information (Springer). For further information on this series see the FoLLI site.
 
How to submit
 
Only electronic submissions are accepted. The  following documents are required:
1. The thesis in pdf or ps format (doc/rtf not accepted);
2. A ten page abstract of the dissertation in ascii or pdf format;
3. A letter of nomination from the thesis supervisor. Self-nominations are not admitted: each nomination must be sponsored by the thesis supervisor. The letter of nomination should concisely describe the scope and significance of the dissertation and state when the degree was officially awarded;
4. Two additional letters of support, including at least one letter from a referee not affiliated with the academic institution that awarded the Ph.D. degree.
All documents must be submitted electronically to buszko@amu.edu.pl. Hard copy submissions are not admitted. In case of any problems with the email submission or a lack of notification within three working days, nominators should write to buszko@amu.edu.pl.
 
Important dates
 
Deadline for Submissions: May 1, 2012. Extended: June 30, 2012. Notification of Decision: July 31, 2012.
Explanation: Due to some technical obstacles, the first call for nominations was announced on the site of FoLLI in the beginning of March 2012 but not widely distributed through mailing lists. Therefore we essentially prolong the deadline now. We ask all potential nominators to inform the chair earlier by a mail to buszko@amu.edu.pl, even before having completed the required documents.
 
Committee
Chris Barker (New York)
Wojciech Buszkowski (chair) (Poznan)
Dale Miller (Palaiseau)
Larry Moss (Bloomington)
Ian Pratt-Hartmann (Manchester)
Ruy de Queiroz (Recife)
Giovanni Sambin (Padua)
Rob van der Sandt (Nijmegen)
Rineke Verbrugge (Groningen)
Heinrich Wansing (Bochum)
Categoria Descrizione & esempi
1 Test di massima performance Prove di intelligenza, batterie attitudinali, test neuropsicologici, prove di apprendimento normate.
2 Test di tipica performance Strumenti che rilevano comportamenti abituali o modalità espressive normate
3 Autovalutazione (Self-report) Questionari, inventari, scale di atteggiamento compilati dal soggetto.
4 Eterovalutazione (Informant-report) Checklist, griglie, questionari compilati da genitori, insegnanti, clinici, pari.
5 Protocolli di intervista Interviste strutturate o semi-strutturate con scoring standardizzato (es. K-SADS, ADI-R).
6 Protocolli di osservazione Sistemi osservativi/behavioral coding con metriche psicometriche (es. ABAS-3 Observation, video-coding con accordo inter-rater).
7 Paradigmi sperimentali standardizzati Compiti di laboratorio o computerizzati (Stroop, Iowa Gambling Task, ecc.).
Licenza Uso libero Uso commerciale Modifiche permesse Attribuzione richiesta Note
Dominio pubblico Si Si Si No Nessun diritto riservato
CC BY Si Si Si Si Massima libertà con attribuzione
CC BY-NC Con licenza o pagamento Libero e gratuito solo se non a fini commerciali
CC BY-ND No Nessuna modifica consentita
CC BY-NC-ND Si Con licenza o pagamento No Si Libero senza modifiche e gratuito solo se non a fini commerciali
CC BY-SA Si Si Si Si Le opere derivate devono mantenere la stessa licenza
Tutti i diritti riservati No No No Di norma sì Uso possibile, e gratuito, se autorizzato
Copyright dell’editore No Con licenza o pagamento No Di norma sì Uso possibile, e a pagamento, se autorizzato
Licenza proprietaria (specificare) Solo se autorizzato Solo se autorizzato Solo se autorizzato Di norma sì Condizioni d’uso definite dal titolare